![]() Russell, Lisa and Ruth Barley (2020) Ethnography, ethics and ownership of data, Ethnography,, 1: 5-25. Research Methods in Linguistics, London: Bloomsbury. Mallinson, Christin (2018) Ethics in linguistic research in Lia Litosseliti (ed). The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. (2008) Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: Guillemin M, Gillam L.(2004) Ethics, reflexivity and ‘‘ethically important moments’’ in research. Gitelman, Lisa (ed) (2013) Raw Data is an Oxymoron. (ed.) Ethics in Applied Linguistics Research: Language Researcher Narratives. Ethical issues in linguistic ethnography: Balancing ![]() 1 (1): 1–8.Ĭopland, Fiona & Angela Creese. and Srikant Sarangi (2004) Editorial: Making applied linguistics matter. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Ĭandlin, Christopher N. In Vijay Bhatia, Winnie Cheng, Bertha Du-Babcock and Jane Lung (eds) Language for Professional Communication: Research, Practice and Training, 6–0. 989-990.īruce, Margaret (2014) The Voice of the Child in Child Protection: Whose Voice?Ĭandlin, Chris N. Mark Hauswald and Jill Baren, (2010) Introduction, Special Issue, Procedural Versus practical ethics Academic Emergency Medicine. New York: Citadel Press.īiros, Michelle H. London: Routledge.īeauvoir, Simone de (1976 ) The Ethics of Ambiguity. European Journal of Social Work 3(1): 5–11.īarton, David and Mary Hamilton (1998) Local Literacies. Grodin (1995) The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremburg code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. The paper concludes by highlighting the differences between academia- and agency-facing procedural ethics, and arguing for greater institutional recognition of ethics in practice, in particular the importance of ongoing dialogue between researchers and participant-stakeholders at all stages of the research process.Īnnas, George and Michael A. Reflective accounts from three participant-stakeholders illustrate the interrelationship between what are often presumed to be distinct moments of a research chronology – access, representation and dissemination – in the process of knowledge making. The main part of the paper centres on ethics in practice, building on Sarangi’s framework for articulating the communicative dimensions to research ethics, and foregrounding the importance of ongoing dialogue between researchers and participant-stakeholders. Drawing on institutional documentation and a researcher’s field notes over two years, the requirements and processes involved in complying with academia-facing and agency-facing regulatory frameworks are summarised and challenges highlighted. This paper explores the procedural ethics and ethics in practice involved in a multi-agency research project exploring professional social work writing. Regulatory frameworks, codified ethics, research collaboration, professional writing Abstract
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |